LARA: Michigan Department of Licensing and Regulatory AffairsMichigan.gov: Official Web Site for the State of Michigan
Michigan.gov Home MPSC Home | Contact MPSC | Sitemap | FAQ | 

E-Dockets
Home
Help
My Account
Click here for Quick Links

U-Number Search:

U-
Video and Cable Industry Cases

Listed below are all electronic cases filed since March 31, 1999. Click on the specific case number to view/access filed documents. These dockets are filed and maintained in electronic format only.

View All Video/Cable Cases First 25 Cases

Viewing 0 - 19 of 19

Last 25 Cases
Case: U-18432 Companies: Commission's Own Motion Open: 08/23/2017
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, directing Negaunee Cable Company to show cause why it should not be found to be in violation of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act, 2006 PA 480, MCL 484.3301 et seq.
Case: U-18341 Companies: Commission's Own Motion Open: 03/28/2017
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, directing Martell Cable Company to show cause why it should not be found to be in violation of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act 2006 PA 480, MCL 484.3301 et seq.
Case: U-18329 Companies: Commission's Own Motion Open: 03/28/2017
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, directing RCI Broadband to show cause why it should not be found to be in violation of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act 2006 PA 480, MCL 484.3301 et seq
Case: U-17927 Companies: Comcast, City of Pontiac Open: 8/24/2015
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of Comcast of Michigan/Mississippi/Tennessee, Inc. against the City of Pontiac regarding its violations of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-17758 Companies: Comcast, Charter Township of Plymouth Open: 12/11/2014
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of COMCAST OF THE SOUTH, INC. against the CHARTER TOWNSHIP OF PLYMOUTH regarding its violations of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-17070 Companies: City of Holland, Comcast of Michigan Open: 3/9/2017
Summary: In the matter of the verified complaint of City of Holland for resolution of a dispute with Comcast of Michigan under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-16182 Companies: CableMax Communications Open: 1/11/2010
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, directing CableMax Communications to show cause why it should not be found to be in violation of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act, 2006 PA 480, MCL 484.3301 et seq.
Case: U-16181 Companies: Pine River Cable Open: 1/11/2010
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, directing Pine River Cable to show cause why it should not be found to be in violation of the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act, 2006 PA 480, MCL 484.3301 et seq.
Case: U-15683 Companies: AT&T Michigan, City of Clawson Open: 10/24/2008
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of AT&T Michigan for resolution of a dispute with the City of Clawson under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15527 Companies: Charter Communications Open: 3/4/2008
Summary: In the matter of the verified complaint of the City of Rogers City for resolution of a dispute with CC Michigan, LLC, d/b/a Charter Communications, under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15439 Companies: City of Romulus, Comcast Open: 10/19/2007
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of The City of Romulus for resolution of a dispute with Comcast of Michigan under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15427 Companies: City of Adrian, Comcast Open: 9/20/2007
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of the City of Adrian for resolution of a dispute with Comcast of Michigan under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15366 Companies: Michigan Chapter of the National Alliance for Community Media, AT&T Michigan Open: 8/14/2007
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of the Michigan Chapter of the National Alliance for Community Media seeking declaratory ruling related to a dispute with AT&T Michigan under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15329 Companies: City of Detroit, Comcast Open: 6/19/2007
Summary: In the matter of the verified complaint of City of Detroit for resolution of a dispute with Comcast of Michigan under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15281 Companies: AT&T Michigan, City of Southfield Open: 4/19/2007
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of AT&T Michigan for resolution of a dispute with the City of Southfield under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15273 Companies: AT&T Michigan Open: 4/11/2007
Summary: In the matter of the complaint of AT&T Michigan for resolution of a dispute with the Charter Township of Redford under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15268 Companies: AT&T Michigan, Township of Grosse Ile Open: 4/2/2007
Summary: In the matter of the petition of AT&T Michigan for resolution of a dispute with the Township of Grosse Ile under the Uniform Video Services Local Franchise Act.
Case: U-15169 Companies: Commission's Own Motion Open: 1/30/2007
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's Own Motion, to establish a standardized form for the uniform video service local franchize agreement pursuant to Section 2(1) of 2006 PA 480.
Case: U-15168 Companies: Commission's Own Motion Open: 1/9/2007
Summary: In the matter, on the Commission's own motion, to seek comment on how the Commission should fulfill its responsibility under Section 10(3) of 2006 PA 480.
First 25 Cases

Viewing 0 - 19 of 19

Last 25 Cases View All Video Cases

Michigan.gov Home | MPSC Home | LARA Home
Accessibility Policy | Link Policy | Privacy Policy | Security Policy | Michigan News | Michigan.gov Survey


Copyright © 2001-2011 State of Michigan